.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
12_4_2008 WRRG to Planning Manager (Letter and Annex A)
We thank you for your letter of the 12th February 2008 and the subsequent follow up letter of 25th March 2008 forwarding the two copy letters as requested.
We are surprised that you are at centre stage in the response to our letter to Mr B C Greenslade which we now understand is categorised as a formal complaint by the Customer Services Manager.
From 1999 until the present day WRRG has provided detailed evidence in the form of written submissions, ground and aerial photographs to show non-compliance by both the previous and present owners.
Legal advice has enabled a blunt written statement to you by the owner
"THE LEGAL ADVICE WE HAVE RECEIVED IS THAT BASED ON OUR CURRENT MANAGEMENT OF THE WILDLIFE CORRIDOR WE WOULD HAVE NO PROBLEMS IN DEFEATING ANY APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT ACTION AND WOULD BE ABLE TO RECOVER OUR COSTS IN DOING SO2.
The new owner goes on to say - "we do not believe that any purpose would be served by submitting a formal application to incorporate the minor changes recommended by Devon Wildlife Trust into the existing agreement".
No lawful reason has been given as to why the S106 Agreement has not been implemented.
Since our first complaint of the 22nd February 1999 we have never been contacted (apart from our Ward Member Mrs M Manuel) in correspondence or even in terms of a query from any elected Councillor, District or Parish or members of the Planning Committee who on a number of occasions have been informed of our concerns on these matters directly - complete silence.
there has been an inexcusable breach of trust between ourselves and those who govern us.
No comments:
Post a Comment